When designing
the instructive strategy for the TED Talk workshop, time limit was the primary
problem for me. There were a lot of pints I would like to address, and it would not take me too long to address
them. But
if taking discussion, dialogue and debriefing into consideration, everything would be in a rush.
In China, real discussion or dialogue is hardly seen in class.
Even if we have a discussion, it won’t last more than five minutes. Students are reluctant to talk and share,
since the teacher will eventually provide the right answer. Therefore, when
design this workshop, I felt quite insecure to plan a relatively long time for
discussion and sharing. I was afraid that no one wanted to say anything and I
had to fill the awkwardness. So I decided to plan 5 minutes at most for each
discussion, and fill the rest of the workshop with lecture, video and hand-on
practice.
The First time when I led the workshop, I was surprised by the dialogue
we had. The two girl were much more talkative than I expected. When we talk
about the application of CER model, they had an “A-Ha” moment and brought their
own writing experience into the discussion. Our conversation lasted much longer
than I planned, so that we didn’t have enough time for another learning task.
But I think it is OK. The point is not teaching, not covering all the agenda I
planned, but learning. The learning tasks are designed to facilitate learning.
As long as learning is transferred and the goal is reached, it is fine to
change the instructional strategy according to the situation.
Another example was the fourth workshop I led, where I met with two
students who were very interested in how technology had changed our way of
thinking. In my original design, we were supposed to use critical thinking
skills to talk about the Google’s driverless car for 5 minutes. However, they
got very highly engaged when one of them led the topic to Facebook. Instead of
gearing the topic back, I chose to follow their interest and incorporate
critical thinking skills into the discussion of that they were passionate
about. It was a not a novel topic and they had already got a lot of ideas about
it. But when using critical thinking to reconsider the assumptions, evidence
and argument they had before, they were brought to a new way to understand the
subject. I could tell that they were
very excited about the innovative ideas resulted from critical thinking. The
learning result could be much more impressive when students are highly engaged.
By giving up the content I planned and following what students wanted to learn
more about, we had a wonderful conversation, during which learning took place
naturally.
There is also a learning happened to me in these two experiences, which
is that students are smart enough to figure things out with time and a little
guidance, and they are very excited about the knowledge they discovered.
Dialogue is a way to show the confidence in students’ ability and provide a
safe platform for them to construct knowledge. I am sharing my experience of
self-directed learning and dialogue education with my professors in China, and
hope that they can find a way to introduce these way of learning to more
Chinese students.